- Too Much - http://toomuchonline.org -
On Wall Street, Still Tis the Season to Be Jolly?
Posted By Sam On December 3, 2011 @ 1:27 pm In Executive Pay | No Comments
By Sam Pizzigati
Wall Street’s power suits aren’t humming along, this December, with all the holiday jingles. Bankers, traders, and law firm partners are quite frankly feeling kind of foul. End-of-year Wall Street bonuses, experts predict , are going to be down from 2010 levels — by as much, on average, as 35 percent.
Total 2011 pay for the typical bond-trading managing director at a top Wall Street securities firm will likely be off, says  Options Group New York co-founder Michael Karp, nearly 40 percent.
But those typical managing directors should be able to survive the holidays quite nicely. Pay cuts will leave average high-powered bond traders with $1.8 million for their daily labors in 2011. The average U.S. worker would have to labor  43 years — an adult lifetime — to take home that same $1.8 million.
Average U.S. workers have to labor 43 years to take home what typical Wall Street managing directors take home in one.
In other words, by any real-world yardstick, Wall Street’s finest are doing just fine. And they owe their good fortune, blockbuster new research makes clear, to the generosity of Uncle Sam’s one and only central bank, the Federal Reserve.
During the financial meltdown, a new analysis  of 29,000 pages of previously secret documents shows, central bankers at the Fed had $1.2 trillion in dirt-cheap loans shoveled out to the nation’s financial institutions, at the crisis peak, and overall committed an incredible $7.77 trillion, as of March 2009, to the financial rescue, taking into account guarantees and lending limits.
This massive wave of subsidies, note  the Bloomberg news analysts who broke the story last week, amounted to a bailout over ten times larger than the $700 billion funneled to banks via the Treasury Department’s controversial Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.
Bloomberg reporters had to win a court case to access the stunning new bailout data. How stunning? The $7.77 trillion the Fed committed to the nation’s financial industry, observes Bloomberg, equaled “more than half the value of everything produced” in the entire United States during the key crisis year.
To put the bailout in more homespun terms: The Fed provided  banks the equivalent of over $25,000 per American.
The nation’s six biggest banks — J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — grabbed  $460 billion of the secret loans. Morgan Stanley took in $10 billion in publicly visible TARP bailout dollars and $107 billion from the hidden Fed loan program.
The Federal Reserve provided banks the equivalent of over $25,000 per American.
All the TARP dollars came with modest strings  on executive pay. To end run the strings, big banks rushed to pay back their TARP bailout and then loudly proclaimed themselves healthy and stable enough to resume business as usual.
Meanwhile, at that same moment, these “healthy” banks were taking advantage of the secret Fed loans to register billions in new profits — with no executive pay strings attached.
The Fed loans came with interest rates as low as 0.01 percent. The banks lent out these loan dollars at much higher rates and made, Bloomberg estimates, at least $13 billion on these transactions. That $13 billion, notes  economist Dean Baker, essentially rates as a pure “gift” from taxpayers.
But the Fed’s total giving to America’s biggest banks has run much higher than that $13 billion. By backstopping big banks so energeticaly, former U.S. senator Ted Kaufman from Delaware points out, the Fed has served notice that the federal government would never let the big banks fail — and that notification continues to translate into favorable borrowing rates for the big banks.
The big banks, for their part, have pooh-poohed all the hubbub about the enormous subsidies they’ve received. They’ve argued that no one should be bent out of joint, since the banks have paid their loans back.
The big banks, counters  financial analyst Steve Randy Waldman, have definitely not paid back the lucrative freedom from downside risk that the Fed and Treasury Department have so graciously provided them.
Massive federal bailout subsidies have also allowed banks to step up their lobbying efforts.
In financial markets, Waldman explains, “risk-bearing” has always been “the ultimate commodity.” The Fed and Treasury underwrote this risk-bearing — for big banks — at next to nothing. Middle class Americans, by contrast, have to pay for their own risk-bearing. They pay, for instance, their fire insurance bills year in and year out, without ever expecting that the Fed is going to foot the bill.
Massive federal bailout subsidies, adds  analyst Les Leopold, have had another spin-off benefit. They’ve “allowed banks to step up their lobbying efforts.” These lobbying efforts, in turn, have saved the banks countless billions more.
One example: Bank political pressure has forged a federal housing crisis policy that protects banks from the “downside” of the crash of the housing market.
But the generosity of top federal officials to America’s banks has gone still further. We learned last week, notes  Reuters analyst Felix Salmon, that Treasury secretary Hank Paulson was “giving inside information to his old Wall Street buddies” right as the financial crisis was unfolding, insider info that helped Goldman Sachs-connected hedge fund managers score millions in easy profits.
The bottom line of all this generosity? The total assets  of America’s top six banks jumped from $6.8 trillion in September 2006 to $9.5 trillion in September 2011. The trading arms of big banks and other independent firms, the Washington Post reports , have generated over $83 billion in profit over the last two and a half years, $6 billion more than they generated over the previous eight.
Returns this massive, in turn, translated last year into the biggest bank compensation  haul in history. Wall Street salaries in New York averaged  $361,330 in 2010, five times the city’s average private-sector pay.
Morgan Stanley alone pocketed enough Fed loans to pay off one-tenth of the country’s delinquent mortgages.
And average Americans? Their economic status continues to slide. A new Rutgers University study out last week documents  that just 7 percent of those Americans “who lost jobs after the financial crisis have returned to or exceeded their previous financial position.” Two million construction workers have lost jobs since the housing collapse began. The industry has hired back only 47,000.
That housing collapse keeps collapsing. Over a quarter of American mortgages, 28 percent, have now sunk  “underwater,” up from 23 percent last year.
Some context for these numbers: The $107 billion in Fed loans that one bank alone, Morgan Stanley, pocketed in September 2008 would have been enough, notes  Bloomberg, “to pay off one-tenth of the country’s delinquent mortgages.
So what ought to be done? For starters, former New York governor Eliot Spitzer urged  last week, Congress ought to require banks to use the profits they made investing their almost interest-free money from the Fed “to write down the value of mortgages of those who are underwater.”
Nassim Nicholas Taleb — a New York University risk engineer, best-selling author, and a hedge fund investor — has a longer-term solution. He wants the feds to start regulating Wall Street pay. No one at a company that would require a taxpayer-financed bailout if it failed, says  Taleb, should “get a bonus, ever.”
“Consider that we trust military and homeland security personnel with our lives, yet we don’t give them lavish bonuses,” he explains. “They get promotions and the honor of a job well done if they succeed, and the severe disincentive of shame if they fail.”
For bankers, Taleb adds, the opposite holds. They get “a bonus if they make short-term profits and a bailout if they go bust.”
Reforms like these still seem, at our current political moment, sheer fantasy. New research  from the Center for Responsive Politics  helps us understand one reason. Nineteen current members of Congress last year held personal investments in Wall Street’s most notorious bank, Goldman Sachs. These investments averaged well over three-quarters of a million dollars.
Nine of these 18 investors just happened to sit on the congressional committees that oversee the financial industry. Two of the 18 not on one of these committees just happened to be the two most powerful leaders in the House, speaker John Boehner and majority leader Eric Cantor.
Sam Pizzigati edits Too Much, the online weekly on excess and inequality published by the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Policy Studies. Read the current issue  or sign up at Inequality.Org  to receive Too Much in your email inbox.
Article printed from Too Much: http://toomuchonline.org
URL to article: http://toomuchonline.org/on-wall-street-still-tis-the-season-to-be-jolly/
URLs in this post:
 predict: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203764804577060652927268624.html
 to labor: http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/28/9069505-wall-street-pay-bonuses-to-plummet-this-year
 new analysis: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28/secret-fed-loans-undisclosed-to-congress-gave-banks-13-billion-in-income.html?utm_source=Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=6bfe0363bc-DD_11_28_1111_28_2011&utm_medium=email
 provided: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/01/opinion/kristof-a-banker-speaks-with-regret.html?utm_campaign=5d8cb4505b-DD_12_1_1112_1_2011&utm_medium=email&_r=1&utm_source=Daily%20Digest&pagewanted=print
 grabbed: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/11/the_7_trillion_secret_loan_program_the_government_and_big_banks_should_be_punished_for_deceiving_the_public_about_their_hush_hush_bailout_scheme_.html
 modest strings: http://toomuchonline.org/making-wall-street-safe-for-windfalls/
 notes: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/beat_the_press/~3/7Fsc8OFQl2g/post-gets-loans-and-gifts-confused-with-big-banks?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email
 counters: http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/2587.html
 adds: http://www.alternet.org/story/153274/
 notes: http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/11/29/hank-paulsons-inside-jobs/?utm_source=Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=46bca26143-DD_11_30_1111_30_2011&utm_medium=email
 total assets: http://www.ffiec.gov/nicpubweb/nicweb/top50form.aspx
 reports: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/wall-streets-resurgent-prosperity-frustrates-its-claims-and-obamas/2011/10/25/gIQAKPIosM_print.html
 compensation: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704124504576118421859347048.html
 documents: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/02/business/for-jobless-little-hope-of-full-recovery-study-says.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha25&pagewanted=print
 have now sunk: http://www.zillow.com/blog/2011-11-07/home-values-flat-in-third-quarter-on-slow-road-to-housing-market-bottom/
 says: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/opinion/end-bonuses-for-bankers.html
 Image: http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5725/t/8798/signUp.jsp?key=1638
 research: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2011/11/goldman-sachs-congress-investors.html
 Center for Responsive Politics: http://www.opensecrets.org/
 the current issue: http://toomuchonline.org/tmweekly.html
 Inequality.Org: http://inequality.org/
2011 Too Much. Creative Commons 3.0 License.